* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:11:23 18:40 +0100]: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:34:41 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar > >Just to provide some statistics about dpkg-sig usage, as I got curious > >about it too: > > > >In the archive, 525 out of 283283 .deb's are dpkg-sig'd (0.19%). There > >are 8 distinct keys used for those 525 .deb's, seven of which correspond > >to DD's[1]. > > So, most of the DD's do not care about security at all. Why does > Debian have a reputation of being so secure?
Yet just today you filed a bug (#340403) for documentation to be included in the package since you were unable to explain dpkg-sig's strengths. How is it possible for you to claim something is more secure when you don't understand it well enough to say how it's different? -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]