Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are you trying to do instead? If you might have noticed, we have > _just_ _another_ ftpmaster situation _right_ _now_, and from handling > of #339686 by a member of the DPL team I don't get the impression that > the DPL team actually cares.
(#340306) > In fact, how can the message of "we don't care about security if it's > ftpmaster breaking security features" be more official than by the > downgrade of that bug to wishlist by a DPL team member? Rejecting signed packages is not equivalent to "we don't care about security". You appear to be complaining that a bug that was filed on Tuesday hasn't been fixed on Wednesday. Further, this appears to be a bug that affects a tiny number of people. Expecting it to be prioritised over anything else that people may be working on is insane, and bringing it up in such a hostile manner (not to mention attempting to use it to claim that the DPL team don't care about your particular issue) isn't going to result in it being fixed faster. Instead, it's going to result in people assuming that you're some sort of conspiracy-theory loon. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
