On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:54:33AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:37:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > Personally, I think it's cryptographic snake oil, at least in so far > > > A signed deb has a seal of procedence and allows one to track the path it > > > made through the system, and who changed it. > > > > That's what the .changes file is for. > > Only possible if the .changes file is still accessable, and going through > the d-d-c archives isn't exactly convenient. > > On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes buildd logs,
Then that description is wrong. It never did include buildd logs, and AFAIK, there are no plans to that effect, either. -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]