Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi all! > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Miles Bader wrote: > > nicely as "texlive-lang-tibetan" and "texlive-fonts-recommended". > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Rogério Brito wrote: > > > texlive-binaries-source 96M > > > texlive-basicbin > > What about texlive-bin-base? > > > As I said, it is true that I can arbitrary hyphens, but there was a > decisison behind these names: Keeping the collections of TeX live (this > is what users see when they use the installer) and the debian packages > namewise in sync. > > I have no problem introducing different names, but only if I see good > reasons other than "I like it" or "it is usual like this". To me, the > argument on name-sync collection-debiannames is strong enough to keep > the current names.
FWIW, Debian package names prefer e.g. foo-en-uk-doc over foo-documentation-ukenglish. This allows to filter documentation packages by name (doc-* or *-doc), and following the standardized ISO abbreviations also seems to be better than using yet another scheme. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]