On Fri, 02 Dec 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote: > To a large extent, this sort of work is currently being done in HAL. Is > there any need to create another level of abstraction, or should we just > work on that? It also sounds (though I'm not certain) like you're
Can I tell HAL to just handle power management instead of touching anything else, and get it to do the right thing in a headless, GUIless server environment? Can I do that with standard, system-wide configuration files? My guess is that yes, that's how HAL is designed to work, but it never hurts too much to be sure... > concentrating on system-wide power management transitions, whereas I'd > argue that it needs to be possible for configuration to be done on a > per-user basis (you wouldn't believe the degree of argument over whether As long as system-wide is possible, AND user-wide *without* GUI is also possible... you're correct, of course. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
