On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:32:59AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > - - requests by the author of a post for that post not to be published > - will be honoured; > + - If the author makes a resonable case that some material is > + sensitive, then that material is redacted from that post and any > + other post where it has been quoted > + > + - If the author indicates he does not wish to be associated with a > + post, any identifying information is redacted from that post, > + and any quotes in subsequent posts, but the rest of the material > + is published.
This policy is less generous than Aj's original proposal - the author cannot veto for unreasonable reasons, only request anonymity. I think it's right to clarify the situation for quotes, but a full veto as per the original proposal is also desirable. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]