Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:40:17AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> and people aren't skilled enough because they aren't allowed to help. > > Er, did you even *read* this thread? We got on the topic of buildds because > *someone refused to help diagnose build failures because they consider it the > buildd admin's job*. This is a concrete and specific task which needs
Did we? I remeber a maintainer checking his package wasn't build, the buildd log showing a trivial missing Build-Depends and requesting the package to be rescheduled for building. Or was that another thread with the same topic? > attention, which doesn't require special access in order to work on, and by > means of which developers can demonstrate their trustworthiness to buildd > maintainers. Instead, people are telling me this is the buildd maintainer's > job, and that no one is going to volunteer to do any porting work unless > they are given the keys to the buildds in the process. Rescheduling a job that failed with a missing build-depends is the buildd admins job. Only people with wanna-build access can do that. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]