On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:22:37PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Heiko M?ller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We found that gcc-2.95 -Os produces object code of acceptable quality > > within reasonable compilation times. gcc >=3 is less efficient w.r.t. > > compilation time and memory consumption and in many cases even fails > > to compile our codes due to the very long expressions. The C/C++ codes > > generated from the computer algebra software are perhaps unusual but > > not broken. > > Can you send in a few (hopefully short) examples that fail as > bugreports?
I cannot speak for Heiko, but my examples are far from short. Indeed they include a statement that is several megabytes long. gcc exhaust all the memory available and fail with Internal compiler error: virtual memory exhausted An gcc version that use less memory will be able to complete the compilation. > There is probably nothing to do about compile time and memory > consuption but it should at least work. Maybe the compiled result is > even faster. Provide you have enough memory to get it at all. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
