On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:43:28PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> 
> > On Jan 04, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev.  Who knows what other 
> >> newer
> >> things newer kernels might require.
> > OTOH, old kernel are buggy and out of date wrt modern hardware, and we
> > lack the manpower to backport for years fixes and new features RHEL-style.
> > Do you have a better solution?
> 
> Why don't we use RHEL's kernel, or collaborate with them to maintain a
> stable kernel tree, or something?

or http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/

-- 
Chris.
======
Reproduction if desired may be handled locally. -- rfc3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to