On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 19:50 +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > On Monday, 9 January 2006 19:26, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > The gconf-sanity-check functionality is optional. As such, its > > > > Why is gconf-sanity-check optional? It seems pretty vital to me. > AFAIK only gdm (or gnome-settings-daemon) uses gconf-sanity-check and both > depend on libgtk2.0-0.
So gconf-sanity-check should be in gconf, and gnome-settings-daemon should depend on gconf? ISTM that since gconf is so vital to GNOME, a sanity checker is vital to be able to fix corruptions. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA "When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him." Franklin D. Roosevelt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]