On Mon, 09 Jan 2006, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote: > Miles Bader wrote: > >So what's the likelihood that this is actually a problem? 0.00001%? > >0.00000000001%? > > Probably a bit higher (not too much), given that radio waves > propagate, and anyone in a large area could see them, but you're > right it's very low.
Considering the occasional bits of spam that get shuttled through lists about obtaining engorged members and the various methods of employing them, anyone who is using packet radio has likely fallen afoul of this section on multiple occasions. > However it's also a fact of professionalism. It's a facet of your standard of professionalism; it may not be a facet that is shared by anyone (or everyone) else. If specific individuals persist in using language that you feel is innapropriate, confer with them privately about it, then killfile them if they persist. I, for one, am far more interested in the message than the way which the message is conveyed. Don Armstrong -- Miracles had become relative common-places since the advent of entheogens; it now took very unusual circumstances to attract public attention to sightings of supernatural entities. The latest miracle had raised the ante on the supernatural: the Virgin Mary had manifested herself to two children, a dog, and a Public Telepresence Point. -- Bruce Sterling, _Holy Fire_ p228 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
