On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 20:25 +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Err, sorry, I meant ยง 97.113(a)(4). > > > > Also, my previous message applies to amateur operators in the US. > > Amateurs in other nations are similiary regulated by their equivelent to > > the FCC, with similar rules which are all based on ITU regulations. > > So what's the likelihood that this is actually a problem? 0.00001%? > 0.00000000001%? > > And by what bizarre standard is saying "foo sucks" really profane??? > Ok, by the "wackos like ed meese" standard maybe -- but nobody cares > about that.
1. Well, Ed Meese does... :) 2. Ed Meese??? Geez, did you have to tip-toe when you were young? (Because the earth hadn't cooled yet?) > In the extremely unlikely event that it is a problem, why should it be > up to list posters to deal with it? If some readers use a service > governed by authorities that are prudish to an absurd degree, it seems > like the onus is on them to try and deal with the probably technically; How exactly do IP packets get transmitted via packet radio? Morse code, with binary files uuencoded? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA "Man, I'm pretty. Hoo Hah!" Johnny Bravo