On 1/13/06, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please stop trying to twist my words around. Canonical didn't contribute > > back. An individual who happened to work for Canonical did. If someone > > employed by the US government contributes to Debian of his own volition do > > we say that the US government gives back to Debian? Do we say that your > > employer gives back to Debian? > > If it's an authorised use of company time, sure. Whether or not it is in > this case, I don't know. >
Exactly my point Matthew, and calm down David, i wrote: "e.g.: David said that Daniel helped him, but if he did that in his workhours it's under Canonical bless.". Do you see ? I just pointed out that there's a possibility that he was helping you in his workhours, but i won't cite you as a reference anymore. -- Gustavo Franco
