Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Fact is, the potential for confusion here never even occurred to > me when we started doing this at Progeny. Quite the contrary to what > Matthew suggests, it seems to me that changing the Maintainer > field is a perfectly reasonable thing to do now that I'm aware of it.
Glad to hear. Is there anyone from Debian who thinks that changing the Maintainer field is a bad idea in these cases (remember that this isn't about credit, because we would certainly request that the Debian maintainer still be mentioned as such in a suitable fashion)? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
