Nathanael Nerode writes: > Then the *source* packages can legitimately use the same Maintainer: field.
> If they are also compiled with a toolchain unchanged from Debian, the > binaries > can legitimately have the same Maintainer: field as in Debian, because they > are essentially the same package. > If not, the binary packages should have different Maintainer: fields Personally, I have no objection to the Maintainer field remaining unchanged when the source package is unchanged. > For instance, debugging bugs in your package generated by a toolchain you > don't have is obnoxious, frustrating, and a waste of time... If building one of my packages with a well-chosen toolchain fails or produces a buggy binary there is probably something wrong with it that will eventually bite me and I'd like to know about it (in the form of a wishlist bug). > Ubuntu should be sorting out whether such problems are present in Debian > before sending them to the Debian maintainer. Ubuntu should certainly first try to make sure the problem is not theirs. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
