Holger Levsen wrote: > Hm, on a second thought this (*) _might_ be a feature: the GFDL says > invariant > sections need to be listed, but there aren't any, as a template has been > used. Yay ?!
I suspect that many of those cases might just be an accidental ommission in the copyright file... OTOH, it is hillarious that after typing 'info gdb' I was unable to actually find the statement saying the documentation is under the GFDL; it appears that the FSF has once again mis-applied their own license... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
