On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:49:09PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > So, one conclusion is clear : Nobody wants a second installer for the > Macromedia Flash Plugin. Efforts should go to flashplugin-nonfree. > Thanks for the comments leading to this consensus. > > Less clear to me is "what now". The maintainer of flashplugin-nonfree > seems to be busy with other things. Would an NMU be appropriate now ?
Yes, if you're following the procedures, a NMU would be fine, as long as you're not doing things against the (expressed or reasonably deduceable) wishes of the maintainer. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]