Robert Millan writes: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:45:24PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > Please also stop insulting ndiswrapper users and developers by calling > > > it a "warez wrapper". > > Actualy, since such "ndis drivers" are often provided with very restrictive > licensing, or with no licensing at all, I have my doubts that inserting them > into Linux kernel is a legal activity.
This is an interesting theory. Drivers' licenses are obviously irrelevant to a discussion of whether ndiswrapper is freely licensed. The FSF's usual position[1] is that the GPL does not require GPL compatibility for non-distributed modifications of a GPLed program. Are you saying that the FSF is incorrect about the GPL, or are you making some other claim about what behavior is permitted? [1]- http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#StolenCopy Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
