Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are a few ways to interpret the word "wrapper". Ndiswrapper could > certainly be seen as a "wrapper" of sorts, but not in the way that > policy means. A "wrapper", as used in policy, is a script or small > executable that will set up the environment (LD_PRELOAD, > LD_LIBRARY_PATH, PATH, ...) and then run the "actual" binary. > /usr/bin/firefox on a Debian system, for example, is a wrapper in the > meaning that policy is talking about.
Wow, all that from one sentence. I don't see policy saying anything of the kind. I can see that this is one interpretation of it, but I can't see any reason to think this is the preferred one. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]