Il giorno mer, 01/03/2006 alle 09.54 +0200, Panu Kalliokoski ha scritto: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:57:07PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > > I would like to ask whether there really is such a guideline, and if so, > > > which are the technical / political reasons that lead to it. > > a) If there is a bug in the packaging, it can be fixed without uploading > > a new upstream source tarball. Assuming upstream version is 1.2, the > > first Debian version would be 1.2-1, and the fixed one would be 1.2-2. > > The .orig.tar.gz file would be the same for 1.2-1 and 1.2-2. > > What benefit does this have in addition to bandwidth savings?
That your fellow DD can make an NMU without bumping the upstream version number (or, even worse, using epochs.) federico -- Federico Di Gregorio http://people.initd.org/fog Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] INIT.D Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Qu'est ce que la folie? Juste un sentiment de liberté si fort qu'on en oublie ce qui nous rattache au monde... -- J. de Loctra
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio è firmata
