On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]:
>
> > Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this?
>
> Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]<enter>'? ('b' does (B)ounce
> in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for...Ouch. Right. I reused my SmapCop configuration, I guess '<tag-prefix><bounce-message>debian-spam-rep\n' should be used instead. So here it is again: ----- cut here ---- alias debian-spam-rep [EMAIL PROTECTED] macro index \cO "<tag-prefix><bounce-message>debian-spam-rep\n" "Bounce mail to Debian" macro pager \cO "<tag-prefix><bounce-message>debian-spam-rep\n" "Bounce mail to Debian" ----- cut here ---- That should bounce all (tagged) messages to the reporting address instead of forwarding them inline when pressing Ctrl+o. You can use "\n\n" instead of "\n" to avoid having mutt ask for confirmation on the bounce (but you might end up getting blacklisted if your cat sleeps on your keyboard with your MUA open). Regards Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
