On Tue, 07 Mar 2006, Brian May wrote: > On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 19:04 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > > > block 322762 with 355341 > > Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug) > > Was blocked by: 189856 190020 203278 254800 254913 254924 254930 255590 > > 256250 302504 319726 320084 320103 321926 322749 322769 322772 322775 > > 322776 322778 322779 322781 322782 322783 322784 322785 322786 322787 > > 322788 322789 322790 322791 322792 322793 322794 322795 322797 322798 > > 322799 322800 322801 322803 322804 322805 322806 322807 322808 322809 > > 322810 322811 322812 322813 322814 322815 322816 322817 322818 322819 > > 322820 322828 322829 322830 322831 322832 322833 322834 322835 322837 > > 322838 322839 352893 352894 353569 > > Blocking bugs added: 355341 > > What does the "block" command do? I have never seen it documented > anywhere, including at <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/>. Did I miss > something?
Indicates that a bug cannot be closed/fixed/addressed until the bugs that it is blocked by are closed. See #342938 et al. for more information about the documentation bug. Don Armstrong -- I now know how retro SCOs OSes are. Riotous, riotous stuff. How they had the ya-yas to declare Linux an infant OS in need of their IP is beyond me. Upcoming features? PAM. files larger than 2 gigs. NFS over TCP. The 80's called, they want their features back. -- Compactable Dave http://www3.sympatico.ca/dcarpeneto/sco.html http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
