* Richard B. Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-11 22:09]: > Jeez, according to my available list, gcc-4.1 is not even in sid, yet. ... > Maybe it would be more productive to calm down a bit and let people play > with that compiler a bit before making it the default.
What I mentioned were the plans according to http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2006/02/msg00173.html I'm currently building the whole archive and I'm sure the GCC maintainers will take the results from that into account. From what it looks like at the moment, there are quite a few failures with G++ 4.1 because its stricter than 4.0, so I'd assume there'll be an announcement on d-d-a and a longer transistion period. (From the posting to the gcc list above it seemed to me that the maintainers thought the 4.1 transition would be easier.) Anyway, I'm about half-way through the archive. I'll report my findings in detail when I'm done. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]