Riku Voipio wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
because dpkg-architecture has a line like this:
return "$os-$cpu";
older dpkg (of sarge age) was more flexible, so likely the
hurd naming decission was not done because of dpkg-architecture,
but rather the other way around.
That's weird, naming a architecure because of a seemingly random
choice made in a script. But OK, that's fair enough...
I am adding some additional archs to my local installation like i386-uclibc,
which makes hurd-i386 an exception to the rule of having the CPU arch first
and the OS name the next.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
