On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:30:44PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > I am surprised, as fftw is an excellent fft package and is still used > by the following (they really should be updated to use fftw version > 3 though). I would expect the maintainer of one of these to take an > interest in this matter. >
I would doubt change fftw2 -> fftw3 in support would appear anytime soon for many packages. They are at least not compatible at API level, and in scientific area people do not change things without a very good reason to do that. Both releases are maintained by upstream AFAIK. Maybe the fftw3 maintainer could be interested in maintainace of fftw2 too... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]