I suppose porting glibc is quite important because it also minimises the porting of everything else that may need to be adapted.
andrew On 4/7/06, Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-06 23:19]: > > > Or as Wouter pointed out on d-d port glibc. > > Which I think would be most beneficial as it additianaly would minimize > the number of packages to add to the archive for the solaris port in > case nexentas work should become a debian subproject one day (and iirc > that was one of the goals). > > yours Martin > -- > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---- Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System > * Joey notices Alfie can read manpages :-) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Andrew Donnellan http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------- Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au Debian user - http://debian.org Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484 OpenNIC user - http://www.opennic.unrated.net
