Le Jeu 13 Avril 2006 15:20, Linas Žvirblis a écrit : > > I think this would be better than a meta package because it would > > be available in the regular install, and it would avoid some of the > > issues with meta packages. > > Meta package or not, I do not consider "Light Desktop" a good name > because it is too general.
> A name like "XFCE desktop" would be way more descriptive. because *you* know what XFCE is and looks like -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpZ0lopgD4Ht.pgp
Description: PGP signature