On 5/18/06, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> First off, I'm going to completely ignore the FAQ as the FAQ and the
> license both specifies that the FAQ does not have any legal validity.
Repeating frequently asked questions that have already been answered
isn't terribly useful.
But I guess the question should be answered by the license, not by the FAQ.
> As a final note, did anyone from Debian who usually examines licences
> actually examine this one?
Yes.
Who?
