Le Lun 29 Mai 2006 07:50, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit : > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Um... usertags have user-defined semantics. How can you claim that > > the usertags being set are wrong? > > As I understand it, the complaint is that bts-link is changing user > tags set by the maintainer. then if that's true (which is not obviously), he is complaining about me changing *my* own usertags. He should use another user for his tags. But honnestly, if you want to know what's wrong (AIUI), it's that: the debian bug is assigned to gcc-4.1, and has been reopened upstream for gcc-snapshot or sth similar. and Matthias is wining because I didn't understood it ??? I should have a web page written about bts-link, I know, but its behaviour is not magical. He sends his updates mails to the $(source_package) the bug is assigned to. Sorry for Matthias, but the debian bug of which I updated the metadata *IS* a gcc-4.1 bug, and there is no behaviour problem in bts-link. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp0PrwnzxJEG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
