On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:50:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst stated: [...] > > However, "trusted processes" do not lie with people who are trying > > to convince you of their identity. If you trust anyone to tell the > > truth about their identity, which is what your argument implies, > > then you have processes that are anything but trusted. It is you who > > would seem to have to be educated about what "trusted processes" > > actually means, not me. > > Fine. I'll see if I can procure a sample identity card from my > friends at work and see if you can spot the difference. I am > willing to bet about a thousand euros that you would not be able to > spot the fake.
Given how the exchange is preannounced, I might be willing to take that bet ;-) > The only thing keeping you on your high horse about people in the > community being trustable is htat you apparently have never seen how > good fake documents can be. I am fully aware that fake documents can be very good. However, your example does not involve any fake document, only dishonesty. A document that belongs to a different person does not make a fake document. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]