-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for all your answers, my package successfully transformed to its new name with apt-get dist-upgrade in my test environment :-)
One last question: would it be safe to say Architecture: all in the dummy transition package since it does not contain any architecture specific files anymore, or is it better to leave it as it is with "Architecture: any" to create architecture specific packages? Thanks, Andreas Andreas Fester wrote: [...] > Problem: > > Upstream application (non-library) has changed its name. > I want to reflect this new name in the debian > package name while ensuring that apt-get dist-upgrade > works seamless and pulls in the new package. [...] - -- Andreas Fester mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.littletux.net ICQ: 326674288 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEfKAjZ3bQVzeW+rsRAvAjAJ4tt0rYSHmlywQO82aRQJih5DdhWwCgokrE vtZ+1nRwH4/ltgXX8E8adtM= =EZaw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]