Scripsit Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Junichi Uekawa [Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:36:43 +0900]:
>> I don't think there is much harm in opening a new NMU bug. > No, there isn't. Plus has been the right way for years, AIUI, and > dev-ref explicitly mentions it. How is it righter than sending the NMU diff to the bug that led one to NMU in the first place? Dev-ref §5.11.4 describes attaching the diff to the original bug as the common case, and explicitly calls opening a fresh bug an alternative. (Presumably to be used when an NMU that fixes many bugs is not easily splittable into individual patches). > There is no need to specify the bug number, since it can be extracted > from the changelog. The question is whether the option shall be --new, > so the default is to send the diff to the fixed bug(s) (my patch), or it > should be --no-open instead, thus defaulting to opening a new bug. Perhaps then the default ought to send to the existing bug if the changelog closes exactly one bug, and open a new bug report otherwise. -- Henning Makholm "Skidt med din brud når der står et par nymfer i tyl og trikot i den lysegrønne skov!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]