64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.136 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.116 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time= 0.113 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.116 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.115 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.115 ms
64 bytes from missing_maintainers: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.113 ms
--- missing_maintainers ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.113 /0.117/0.136/0.007 ms
On 6/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
Peter Veenstra (dosbox)
I have not noticed many updates to these programs recently, and both seem to
have some ignored bugs in the bts such as
#336433
#312969
#301925
#362928
I have sent both maintainers emails to which I received no reply. Just
attempting to ping the list to see if they are active or mia.
Thanks all,
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
