[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi. > > My dillema: > > 1) compile docs pre-build-time; or > 2) compile docs in build-time > > > Pros of 1: < build-time and < Build-Depends > > Pros of 2: < diff.gz and unnecessary manual intervention of downstream > maintainer (me :) ) > > So, what are best practices about this?
[cut] Rewriting dillema, after answers: (re)buildability versus maintenance cost. (Re)buildability wins :). If in doubt, compile build-time docs. Rebuildability is important per se, since is condition of better softwares. So, build-time doc compiles is better option (generally). I'm a newbie and I'm learning. Fix me if I am wrong about something, please. Thanks all. Regards, -- Marcio Roberto Teixeira _______________________________________________________________________ I use newsreader (nntp). Don't send messages directly to my email, please (even replies or follow-ups); keep all threads here and only here. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ keys: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net http://marciotex.googlepages.com/keypub_8709626B.asc home page (building): http://marciotex.googlepages.com "tchĂȘ" Debian/GNULinux user Porto Alegre - RS - Brasil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]