Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you really believe that you are able to deflect from the main problem: > > > > The original sources do not have such bugs and many Debian users that > > did write bug reports against the Debian version of cdrtools did already > > switch to a self compiled original source in order to get a working > > cdrecord. > > > > Why don't you read my reply? > > I rather burn my own CDs/DVDs and see for myself if the program works. > > Your source: total failure. > Debian source: works perfectly for years. > > Conclusion: Debian patches are GOOD. And that for years and years.
Nice try for trolling: This is of course a lie.....or why don't you like to prove it: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/problems.html Come back to reallity, the k3b maintainers did already give up with Debian versions of cdrtools and use self-compiled unmodified originalsources. Guess why? It is the Debian variant that dioes not work while the original works out of the bix. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
