On Monday 28 August 2006 21:06, Steve Langasek took the opportunity to say: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:01:57PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > Making mail-transport-agent the empty package, and having it depend only > > on exim4 (the default), should work. Of course, exim4 can't conflict with > > it (but it's enough that all the others do), > > No, that's not enough. The exim4 package has file conflicts with the other > implementors of m-t-a; there need to be Conflicts declared *directly* > between exim4 and the others.
So "package-a conflicts package-b" is not the same thing as "package-a conflicts package-b AND package-b conflicts package-a"? The policy seems to be saying that if a package conflicts with another package (asymmetric), then they can't be installed at the same time (symmetric). -- Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpFhlD9LF7KT.pgp
Description: PGP signature