On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 19:41:53 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > As a conclusion and combining both, I would really like to unsderstand > why so many fellow developers insist on using LOW priority NOTES in > their debconf templates and use them in maintainer scripts.
> Packages with low priority debconf notes: > ----------------------------------------- > > Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > fbset -- config:16 fbset/create_framebuffer_devices As Mark Brown, I did that following the policy. I don't have any problem removing it, but would be nice to get the policy fixed. > xfstt -- config:13 xfstt/default_port_changed Fixed in incoming. > Packages with medium priority debconf notes: > -------------------------------------------- > > Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > bochs -- config:10 bochs/bochsrc Will be fixed with next upload. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
