-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/15/06 00:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 07:30:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: [snip] > I think it should be in the porters control what packages to > build for an arch with some guidelines what sort of packages can > be removed without loosing release status. For example removing > KDE would not be OK. Removal should be reserved for extreme cases > though. Things that just need long to build should be put into > weak_no_auto and limited to the stronger buildds of an arch.
Why *shouldn't* KDE, GNOME, Firefox/Iceweasel, Tbird, and anything that requires Mesa/OpenGL, and all of Charles Plessy's scientific packages be marked do_not_build on 68k/Coldfire & ARM? If an Amiga (using the unaccelerated fb driver?) is running as an X Terminal for a powerful, modern box, the Amiga would need to process the OpenGL commands, no? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFMdGhS9HxQb37XmcRAqDRAJ9vMAMZ8ZxvVXByqtZ9BRGGB2wifwCgqebl V68y29Jjbv9UJ+57ZDhDxsA= =wexU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]