* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061019 21:14]: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:06:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061019 20:42]: > > > Note how subtly the Etch RC policy removes the first alternative of the > > > serious bug description... > > > > Which do you mean? Please read the Etch RC policy. It tells: > > | In addition to the issues listed in this document, an issue is release > > | critical if it: > > | [...] > > | * in the maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable > > | for release > > > > So, what does the Etch RC policy remove from the bugs.d.o description? > > 'is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or > "required" directive), or'
The html-code for this part is: <DT><CODE>serious</CODE> <DD>is a <a href="http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt";>severe violation of Debian policy</a> (roughly, it violates a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release. So, obviously http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities defines that "severe violation of Debian policy" means anything referenced in the etch_rc_policy-document. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
