On Sun October 22 2006 23:22, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I still think we should go for quality of implementation. > > I also seem to be a minority in this regard.
I sincerely hope not. > If the project feels that we should downgrade policy not to > set our maintainer scripts to allow for the admin to set /bin/sh to > be not bash, they can file a bug on policy, and so indicate their > belief on the bug reprot; I'll reluctantly degrade policy. As long as Debian allows alternatives to /bin/sh -> /bin/bash, the only bugs which should be filed, afaict, are those against packages whose scripts specify /bin/sh and fail to work with any "sh" but bash... clearly they are buggy and should be specifying /bin/bash as their command interpreter. - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
