On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:32:09PM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote: > On Tue October 31 2006 21:15, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > Bruce Sass wrote: > > > I have yet to see a spam message sent to the BTS which used a > > > "Package:" pseudoheader, so that should work to eliminate BTS spam > > > without preventing non-DD's helping out. > > > > OTOH, a /lot/ of legitimate mail is sent to the BTS w/o a Package: > > pseudo-header (think: pretty much anything to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]). So this isn't really a solution. > > I don't think that disqualifies it as a solution, it just means there > would be a transition period while users learn that it is a required > part of messages sent to the BTS.
It isn't currently a requirement (or indeed any use at all), so introducing a requirement just to compat spam does not seem like a good solution. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
