On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:27:59AM -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > I fixed bug#396232 in devscripts version 2.9.24. But when I went to > > http://bugs.debian.org/devscripts, it listed this bug among the open > > bugs. Why? Because m68k or some other arch had not yet autobuilt > > version 2.9.24 and was still on 2.9.22. However, the > > non-version-tracking page showed this bug as fixed. > > Yes, this is IMHO a little drawback, but doesn't seem terrible to me, > and I also consider good that maintainers are aware that the bugs are > not yet close on all archs. > > There has been comments whether the default unstable view should take > into consideration only release-archs or not, that's another topic but > might be related if you are mostly annoyed by non-release candidate > archs.
I'm not so much annoyed by any particular arch, but if I want to see which bug I should work on next, I'm annoyed when bugs I've already fixed reappear in the "Normal bugs" list. In a separate email I've suggested that it would be good to have a separate category for "Pending autobuilding" or something for such bugs. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
