Hello, I write as someone preparing an NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393311.
Template Toolkit 2.15 removed a few plugin modules from the main distribution and I would like to package this new version. The plugins removed are: Template::Plugin::DBI Template::Plugin::XML Template::Plugin::GD I've checked packages depending on libtemplate-perl, and the only package that appears to use any of these plugin modules is bugzilla. Would it therefore be okay to simply package libtemplate-plugin-gd-perl, and have bugzilla depend on it (and possibly the equivalent libtemplate-plugin-dbi-perl and libtemplate-plugin-gd-perl packages), and then upload a new libtemplate-perl reflecting upstream's changes with a NEWS.Debian entry explaining the change? Should libtemplate-perl then Recommend or Depend on the new separate plugin modules? My intuition would be to avoid a Depends. Thanks, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]