Le Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:18:26PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > I think you're confusing the buildd admin with the porters. I expect > porters to read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, I don't expect > the same from the buildd admin.
Dear all, Maybe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" lists should be read by "those who care" instead of just those who port ? When such a list does not react anymore, does it really make sense to ask a DD to take the responsability of a buildd and spend his time for an arch in which he has no particular interest ? I think that it would be a much better situation if a buildd admin would be somebody who particularly cares for the corrseponding port. This would warrant some reactivity, and if a core group of DDs interested in a port can not provide a buildd admin, it may mean that the support for the existence of the port is not sufficient. (said after having wasted hours with the s390 port some weeks ago - I did not guess that the buildd admin was not reading the list on which I posted my mails). Have a nice day, and happy new year to those who celebrate it this evening. -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wako, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
