Luis Matos wrote: > Later back, some issues occored and i was told that CC was not, but a > new version was to come. > > is it considered free now? the 2.5 or 1.0?
no, cc 3.0* (without non-derivates and non-commercial flavours) will be most likely DFSG compliant. check the debian-legal archives and the wiki about it if you want to know more. * somewhere, evan posted a summary about the cc 3.0 progress, don't remember where it was. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
