Hi Nikita! You wrote:
> I would like to ask, is it considered a bug or not, if debian/rules > implicitly depends on umask 022 (and produces packages with broken file > permissions if umask is more strict). > E.g. see #399058. > If this is considered a bug, I guess it may be a subject for mass > bug-filing... Yes, I definately consider this a bug. I have a 077 umask, and packages not handling this gracefully in debian/rules (e.g. using cp rather than install to install file into debian/tmp or so) has bitten me multiple times in the past. I wouldn't consider it RC though, as all autobuilder and pbuilder environments use a 022 umask (afaik). -- Kind regards, +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | |----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]