On Monday 08 January 2007 20:57, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also sprach Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.08.0007 +0100]: > > Is there any technical reason why busybox could not have such > > functionality? If not I'll file a bug report (and I'll write the > > code if I ever have spare time). > > Why busybox and not just mdassemble, which is a stripped version of > mdadm?
Where do I find this mdassemble? A grep of Contents-i386.gz gives: usr/bin/mdassembler devel/monodoc-base I doubt that is what you refer to. mdassemble would be good, but having it linked to busybox would be better. Having dynamically linked binaries in the initramfs causes a lot of disk space to be used by libc. Having two statically linked binaries means two copies of common libc code (EG printf). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://etbe.blogspot.com/ My Blog http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
