Am Samstag 03 Februar 2007 13:17 schrieb Russell Coker: > Anyway, if the overhead of SE Linux in the kernel is something you consider > to be a problem then there are many bigger problems that you will have with > the Debian kernel packages (or probably any kernel image from a binary > distribution). Best to just compile your own kernel.
At some point they just add. I don't have a problem compiling my own kernels but is there any site describing use case scenarios for selinux and also consider to not use it for some scenarios? It's just that I am pretty sure that I do not need it. However, using the term "security" seems to set a flag in some minds that somehow implies the idea of getting it to everyone, needed or not. Is it that strange to raise a flag and keep saying that there are some that don't need it and don't want it? Typical example in _my_ case are selinux and fine grained file system extended ACLs. HS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]