On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Mike Hommey wrote: > A probable reason is that the NM process is getting tougher and/or that > some developpers didn't even pass an NM process...
Then we are better off without them. I can understandy anyone trying to avoid NM in the grounds that it is a hassle (as in they'd rather be doing something else), etc. But any current DDs who would have real trouble getting through NM really should leave. I very much doubt any of our active, skilled old-school DDs that never went through NM would have any sort of trouble with it. It would take some time and minor effort -- it always does -- but that's about it. I suppose there must be some valid reasons to oppose the process, but lazyness and the need to vote once an year are not good ones. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]