#include <hallo.h> * Loïc Minier [Mon, Feb 26 2007, 01:32:50PM]: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > A good example already comes to my mind where the maintainer > > is doing uploads but only for bugs that have RC priority or important > > and are easy to fix. Not matching this criteria? Then you are simply > > ignored. No answer. Not one single word from the maintainer over many > > months even while people are providing patches to fix it. > > I already warned you about this privately in december; here's another
"Warn"? You feel the need to warn me? Does bringing me to STFU make you happy or so? > slap (all bugs with patches in packages you maintain): > #402483: 77 days, no reply > #402521: tentative upload, but missed the patch, 49 days without action > #408718: 29 days, no reply > #362994: 315 days, no reply > #287154: 2 years and 63 days, no reply Nice game. Pointless attempt to create a "who wants to throw the first stone" situation. Looking at your dirty clothes: 401095 359033 371694 372127 372611 373277 375904 403194 What about them? Now don't tell me "It is okay the package was adopted from other bad maintainer". I adopted some bug hives too. > I've lost enough time I could use in better ways by compiling these 5 If you need that much time to find extreme cases for all the packages I maintain then I think the percentage is quite low. > reports, I do hope they'll bring your position back to a more > reasonable definition of what is acceptable and what is not. You need to make an example on myself to create some definition? Sounds like a lame excuse for a childish contest. If you don't like to hear that then I am sorry but you started it. Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]